<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Island 94 &#187; search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.island94.org/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.island94.org</link>
	<description>Ben Sheldon&#039;s lost &#38; found</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Ribbon Commissions in Print</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2010/12/blue-ribbon-commissions-in-print/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2010/12/blue-ribbon-commissions-in-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.island94.org/?p=2342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was annoyed by my previous post quoting the New York Times' usage of "blue ribbon panel" (and the numerous appeals to authority in that entire article) that I looked it up using Google Search's timeline: site:nytimes.com ["blue ribbon panel" OR "blue ribbon commission"]. There were 621 results. Related posts:Advocacy in print — Survival News [...]


<strong>Related posts:</strong><ol><li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/03/advocacy-in-print-survival-news-for-2011/' rel='bookmark' title='Advocacy in print — Survival News for 2011'>Advocacy in print — Survival News for 2011</a> <small>Today I sent another issue of Survival News—“the voices of low-income women”—to the printers; this is my second year as...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/06/irrefutable-gerunds/' rel='bookmark' title='Irrefutable gerunds'>Irrefutable gerunds</a> <small>Gerunds were referenced in yesterday’s post. Below is from William Easterly’s “Foreign Aid for Scoundrels”, published in the New York...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/06/print-share-not-everyone-is-a-social-media-ninja-nor-need-they-be/' rel='bookmark' title='Print &amp; Share: not everyone is a social media ninja (nor need they be)'>Print &amp; Share: not everyone is a social media ninja (nor need they be)</a> <small>Today is the deadline for DonorsChoose’s Hacking Education Contest, and fortunately I have completed and submitted Print and Share (with no...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.island94.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/blue-ribbon-commission.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2343" title="blue ribbon commission" src="http://www.island94.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/blue-ribbon-commission-500x90.png" alt="" width="500" height="90" /></a></p>
<p>I was annoyed by my <a href="http://www.island94.org/2010/12/proposals-to-change-the-tax-deductibility-of-donations/">previous post</a> quoting the New York Times' usage of "blue ribbon panel" (and the numerous appeals to authority in that entire article) that I looked it up using Google Search's timeline: <em><a href="http://www.google.com/search?tbs=tl:1&amp;q=site:nytimes.com+[%22blue+ribbon+panel%22+OR+%22blue+ribbon+commission%22]">site:nytimes.com ["blue ribbon panel" OR "blue ribbon commission"]</a>.</em> There were 621 results.</p>


<p><strong>Related posts:</strong><ol><li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/03/advocacy-in-print-survival-news-for-2011/' rel='bookmark' title='Advocacy in print — Survival News for 2011'>Advocacy in print — Survival News for 2011</a> <small>Today I sent another issue of Survival News—“the voices of low-income women”—to the printers; this is my second year as...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/06/irrefutable-gerunds/' rel='bookmark' title='Irrefutable gerunds'>Irrefutable gerunds</a> <small>Gerunds were referenced in yesterday’s post. Below is from William Easterly’s “Foreign Aid for Scoundrels”, published in the New York...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/06/print-share-not-everyone-is-a-social-media-ninja-nor-need-they-be/' rel='bookmark' title='Print &amp; Share: not everyone is a social media ninja (nor need they be)'>Print &amp; Share: not everyone is a social media ninja (nor need they be)</a> <small>Today is the deadline for DonorsChoose’s Hacking Education Contest, and fortunately I have completed and submitted Print and Share (with no...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2010/12/blue-ribbon-commissions-in-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A deucedly outrag* wordlist</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2010/10/a-deucedly-outrag-wordlist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2010/10/a-deucedly-outrag-wordlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissembling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordlist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.island94.org/?p=2266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR has a story on an algorithm created by researchers David Larcker and Anastasia Zakolyukina that can allegedly detect when business leaders are being dishonest about their company’s practices or earnings. Unfotunately, they don’t publish the complete wordlists used in their algorithm (pdf) , just these 2 categories: Extreme positive emotions amaz*, A-one, astonish*, awe-inspiring, awesome, [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR has a story on an <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130544236">algorithm created by researchers David Larcker and Anastasia Zakolyukina</a> that can allegedly detect when business leaders are being dishonest about their company’s practices or earnings. Unfotunately, they don’t publish the complete wordlists used in their <a href="http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/pdf/larckerzakolyukia.pdf">algorithm</a> (pdf) , just these 2 categories:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Extreme positive emotions<br />
</strong> amaz*, A-one, astonish*, awe-inspiring, awesome, awful, bang-up, best, bless*, brillian*, by all odds, careful*, challeng*, cherish*, confidence, confident, confidently, convinc*, crack, cracking, dandy, deadly, definite, definitely, delectabl*, delicious*, deligh*, deucedly, devilishly, dynam*, eager*, emphatically, enormous, excel*, excit*, exult, fab, fabulous*, fantastic*, first-rate, flawless*, genuinely, glori*, gorgeous*, grand, grande*, gratef*, great, groovy, hero*, huge, illustrious, immense, in spades, in truth, incredibl*, insanely, inviolable, keen*, luck, lucked, lucki*, lucks, lucky, luscious, madly, magnific*, marvellous, marvelous, neat*, nifty, outstanding, peachy, perfect*, phenomenal, potent, privileg*, rattling, redoubtable, rejoice, scrumptious*, secur*, sincer*, slap-up, smashing, solid, splend*, strong*, substantial, succeed*, success*, super, superb, superior*, suprem*, swell, terrific*, thankf*, tiptop, topnotch, treasur*, tremendous, triumph*, truly, truth*, unassailable, unbelievable, unquestionably, vast, wonderf*, wondrous, wow*, yay, yays, very good</p>
<p><strong>Extreme Negative Emotions<br />
</strong> abominable, abortive, absurd, advers*, ambitious, annihilating, annihilative, atrocious, awful, badly, baffling, barbarous, bias, breach, brokenhearted, brutal*, calamitous, careless*, catchy, challenging, cockeyed, coerce, crafty, craz*, cruel*, crushed, cunning, curious, danger*, daunting, daze*, defect*, degrad*, demanding, demeaning, depress*, derisory, despair*, desperat*, despicable, destroy*, devastat*, devil*, difficult*, dire, direful, disastrous, disgraceful, dodgy, dread*, exasperating, exorbitant, extortionate, fail*, farcical, farfetched, fatal*, fateful, fault*, fearful*, fearsome, fierce, finished, fright*, frustrat*, funny, grave*, griev*, guileful, hard, harebrained, harm, harmed, harmful*, harming, harms, heartbreak*, heartbroke*, heartless*, heartrending, heartsick, hideous, hopeless*, horr*, humbling, humiliat*, hurt*, idiot, idiotic, ignominious, ignor*, implausible, impossible, improbable, inauspicious, inconceivable, inferior* , infuriating, inglorious, insane, insecur*, intimidat*, jerk, jerked, jerks, kayoed, knavish, knocked out, knotty, KOd out, KO’d out, laughable, life-threatening, luckless*, ludicrous*, maddening, madder, maddest, maniac*, menace, mess, messy, miser*, misfortunate, mortifying, muddle, nast*, nonsensical, outrag*, overwhelm*, painf*, panic*, paranoi*, pathetic*, peculiar*, pessimis*, pickle, piti*, precarious, preconception, prejudic*, preposterous, pressur*, problem*, reek*, resent*, ridicul*, roughshod, ruin*, savage*, scandalous, scourge, serious, seriously, severe*, shake*, shaki*, shaky, shame*, shock*, silly, skeptic*, slimy, slippery, squeeze, steep, strange, stunned, stupefied, stupid*, suffer, suffered, sufferer*, suffering, suffers, sunk, terribl*, terrified, terrifies, terrify, terrifying, terror*, threat*, thwarting, ticked, tough*, tragic* , transgress, trauma*, tremendous, trick*, trigger-happy, ugl*, unbelievable, unconscionable, unconvincing, unimaginable, unimportant, unlucky, unmanageable, unspeakable, unsuccessful*, untoward, unworthy, usurious, vehement, vexing, vicious*, victim*, vile, violat*, violent*, vulnerab*, washed-up, wicked*, withering, wonky, worst, worthless* , wretched, very bad</p></blockquote>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2010/10/a-deucedly-outrag-wordlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search is not Serendipitous</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/search-is-not-serendipitous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/search-is-not-serendipitous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erin McKean makes the point in a TED talk that, unlike paper dictionaries, online dictionary searches do not provide serendipity: finding something you didn’t know you were looking for. I take this many ways: True, but… How many people regularly flip a dictionary? How exact is search? How many people just type the word into [...]<p><a href="http://www.island94.org/2008/09/search-is-not-serendipitous/">&#9734; Permalink</a></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erin McKean makes the point in a <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/erin_mckean_redefines_the_dictionary.html">TED talk</a> that, unlike paper dictionaries, online dictionary searches do not provide serendipity: finding something you didn’t know you were looking for.</p>
<p>I take this many ways:<br />
True, but…<br />
How many people regularly flip a dictionary?<br />
How exact is search?<br />
How many people just type the word into Google (which, because internet search sucks, is quite serendipitous).</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/09/10/mckean-lexicography">Daring Fireball</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/search-is-not-serendipitous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get a Government Job</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/get-a-government-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/get-a-government-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tropic Thunder move Boogeyman dvd I've been thoroughly amused by the vetting process for political (and supposedly un-political) government positions. Recently there was the vetting for Sarah Palin, VP for McCain's Republican ticket: Defending his choice and the team that helped pick her, McCain said Tuesday that “the vetting process was completely thorough.” Advisers said [...]<p><a href="http://www.island94.org/2008/09/get-a-government-job/">&#9734; Permalink</a></p>


<strong>Related posts:</strong><ol><li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/03/it-was-sexist-when-i-got-here/' rel='bookmark' title='…it was sexist when I got here'>…it was sexist when I got here</a> <small>I find the concept of feminization—how the presence or predominance of women in certain roles or occupations affect those roles...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="display: none;"><a href="http://utero.pe/?tropic_thunder">Tropic Thunder move</a></div>
<p><span style="display: none; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.chainreaction-community.net/?boogeyman">Boogeyman dvd</a></span> I've been thoroughly amused by the vetting process for political (and supposedly un-political) government positions.</p>
<p>Recently there was the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26527513/">vetting for Sarah Palin</a>, VP for McCain's Republican ticket:</p>
<blockquote><p>Defending his choice and the team that helped pick her, McCain said Tuesday that “the vetting process was completely thorough.” Advisers said Palin went through a rigorous process that included a three-hour interview and a survey with some 70 questions, including: Have you ever paid for sex? Have you been faithful in your marriage? Have you ever used or purchased drugs? Have you ever downloaded pornography?</p></blockquote>
<p>Those 5 questions are good to juxtapose against the Nexis <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/07/report-former-j.html">search string Monica Goodling used to research applicants</a> to the Bush Attorney General's office:</p>
<blockquote><p>[First name of a candidate]! and pre/2 [last name of a candidate] w/7 bush or gore or republican! or democrat! or charg! or accus! or criticiz! or blam! or defend! or iran contra or clinton or spotted owl or florida recount or sex! or controvers! or racis! or fraud! or investigat! or bankrupt! or layoff! or downsiz! or PNTR or NAFTA or outsourc! or indict! or enron or kerry or iraq or wmd! or arrest! or intox! or fired or sex! or racis! or intox! or slur! or arrest! or fired or controvers! or abortion! or gay! or homosexual! or gun! or firearm!</p></blockquote>


<p><strong>Related posts:</strong><ol><li><a href='http://www.island94.org/2011/03/it-was-sexist-when-i-got-here/' rel='bookmark' title='…it was sexist when I got here'>…it was sexist when I got here</a> <small>I find the concept of feminization—how the presence or predominance of women in certain roles or occupations affect those roles...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2008/09/get-a-government-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lumifi Search Widget</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2008/06/lumifi-search-widget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2008/06/lumifi-search-widget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve found the Lumifi Search / Research Platform useful at times, but it sometimes seems like a sledgehammer. They have a widget for just search that’s pretty useful. If I’m looking for specific things with a lot of noise (like “nonprofit culture”), it tends to give some interesting results. Get the lumifi widget and many [...]<p><a href="http://www.island94.org/2008/06/lumifi-search-widget/">&#9734; Permalink</a></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve found the <a href="http://lumifi.com">Lumifi Search / Research Platform</a> useful at times, but it sometimes seems like a sledgehammer.  They have a widget for just search that’s pretty useful.  If I’m looking for specific things with a lot of noise (like “nonprofit culture”), it tends to give some interesting results.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgetserver.com/syndication/subscriber/InsertWidget.js?appId=c29c5394-4aaf-4324-aab7-5ec01fb41702"></script><noscript>Get the <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/widget/lumifi">lumifi</a> widget and many other <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/galleryhome/">great free widgets</a> at <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com">Widgetbox</a> !</noscript></p>
<p>They also have it as an <a href="http://www.lumifi.com/Widget.html">OSX Dashboard Widget</a>.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2008/06/lumifi-search-widget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Relevance</title>
		<link>http://www.island94.org/2007/10/google-relevance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.island94.org/2007/10/google-relevance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Slashdot today was an entry about Google Search if it was designed for Google. Basically redesigning the page for a higher pagerank. Fun, but the interesting thing was a comment from the comments: Should read: What if Google was a useless site… …and had to design for Google? Lets see… counter examples… how about [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Slashdot today was an <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/16/135209">entry</a> about <a href="http://www.meangene.com/google/design_for_google.html">Google Search if it was designed for Google</a>.  Basically redesigning the page for a higher pagerank.</p>
<p>Fun, but the interesting thing was a <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=329457&#038;cid=20998511">comment</a> from the comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Should read: What if Google was a useless site…</p>
<p>…and had to design for Google?</p>
<p>Lets see… counter examples… how about searching Google for the word “shipping”. What do you know, UPS and Fedex are #1 and #2, and their front pages aren’t a mess of useless, Google-pleasing crap. Maybe because they are real businesses and aren’t pandering some direct ship junk or get rich quick scheme.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes sense, and is the basis for what I tell people who are concerned about SEO disproportionately to having a useful and relevant website: concentrate on having a good service and a useful website first.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.island94.org/2007/10/google-relevance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.island94.org @ 2012-02-10 13:47:35 -->
