Search is not Serendipitous

.!.

Raiders of the Lost Ark rip Erin McKean makes the point in a TED talk that, unlike paper dictionaries, online dictionary searches do not provide serendipity: finding something you didn’t know you were looking for.

I take this many ways:

Titan A.E. psp

True, but…
How many people regularly flip a dictionary?
How exact is search?
How many people just type the word into Google (which, because internet search sucks, is quite serendipitous).

(via Daring Fireball

November Son divx

Related posts:

  1. It’s complicated Since I just posted about how social roles affect social values, here’s a scenario we recently had in my Critical...
  2. Transactions vs. Relationships From John Burne (former editor-in-chief at Businessweek): Many incumbents resent that most efforts to find information on the Web no...


One Response to “Search is not Serendipitous”

bec on September 15th, 2008

Well, you can’t use a dictionary without flipping through it; looking at words other than your target is an intrinsic part of the tool. Search is precise enough that you’re not going to find “serenade” if you search for “serendipity”. I would say that internet search doesn’t “suck” badly enough to give you wrong results that are interesting, only enough to give you bad results that are useless.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)