Looks like the FCC has “demonstrate[d], once again, that at present it is difficult, if not impossible to apply public interest pressure to TV stations via the Commission’s license renewal process.”
A Chicago/Milwaukee appeal was made to the FCC over a lack of local and regional political coverage from area broadcasters: less than 1% went to non-federal election coverage in the month prior to the election.
Also interesting how they cut up the types of coverage:
As for the style of the stories, or “frame,” as the CMPA study put it, most went to “horse race” stories (guesstimating a candidates’ electoral chances at the moment) and “strategic” stories (“how the candidate was using an event to reach particular groups of voters”). Strategy and horse race items dominated coverage. Issues-oriented features counted for less than a fifth of air time.
Related posts:
- Why framing matters Lewis Hyde’s introduction from Frames from the Framers: How America’s Revolutionaries Imagined Intellectual Property: The linguist George Lakoff has been...
- The journalism landscape in a nutshell This lede is the baseline from which I think any discussion of contemporary journalism should begin: There have been various...
- Metaphor death A well-worded comment by Kia to a Gift Hub post entitled Money Has Failed in its Role of Allocating Resources...
